Camosun Story #78: Mary

Mary has been an instructor in the BSN (Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing) program at Camosun College since January 2000.  Prior to that she graduated from Camosun with an Associate of Arts and Nursing Diploma (1992), then completed a Post Registered Nurse program Bachelor of Science of Nursing (BSN) from the University of Victoria, followed by a Master of Science of Nursing (MSN) at the University of British Columbia (UBC). All the while, Mary was working as a nurse spending much of her time in both complex and acute care hospital settings.

Mary has always had a passion for teaching. “In the master’s program at UBC you can focus on different streams, one of which is curriculum education. My curriculum education instructor, Dr. Barbara Paterson, talked to us about how important it is for teaching to be meaningful and fun, and that you want to meet the students where they’re at. I was drawn to that perspective on education, and it’s something I’ve continued throughout my career as an educator.” When Mary graduated from UBC, she continued to work as a Registered Nurse at the bedside but began to consider what else she wanted to do. Dr. Paterson’s words stuck with her, so she asked some of her mentors if she should apply for teaching jobs, and they told her yes! While Camosun was not hiring when Mary applied, one of the instructors in the program suddenly had to go on leave and Mary was brought in to teach her class. “And that was how I began to share my passion for nursing and teaching with the student nurses at Camosun.”

For the first few years Mary taught, she went back and forth between teaching first- and second-year courses, “but I gravitated towards the first year because that’s where we introduce and teach our students about complex care, independent living, and older adults. I also enjoy working with students who are new to the college life. When I was a student at Camosun, I found the transition from high school to college life very stressful, but the supports I got made all the difference in transitioning from that smaller environment to the larger environment. So, I really enjoy those first few months where you’re really supporting new students; it’s almost like when, as a nurse, you assess your patients when admitting them to find what supports they need.”

I wondered what else, aside from supporting first year students, Mary enjoyed about teaching.  “I have a passion for supporting Indigenous students. The Nursing program began to save seats for Indigenous students in the early 2000’s. Before HHS hired an Indigenous Support Coordinator, I and other instructors provided support for the new Indigenous students.  I am especially inspired by Indigenous Liaison Nurses and Indigenous nurses in our communities, and I continue to incorporate Indigenous education knowledge into my classes and support the students.”

In addition, Mary told me that being an instructor “feels like Christmas time all the time.  Students are so excited when they see something new, for example when my first-year students are out in nursing practice for the first time – they’re in their Camosun scrub uniforms, getting to know their clients, and having that textbook relational practice become real. I feel so honored to see the light, the happiness, the engagement, and the care that happens, to see that I am making a difference in their lives.” And Mary especially loves it when she runs into past students in the hospital that are now RNs, knowing that she had a part in where they are now. “It energizes me to know that even if I’m not directly caring for those patients somebody I taught is, someone who has been inspired by something I did or said. I love being a nurse, and I love being an educator. What an honor to be able to combine two amazing careers into one.”

I wondered what teaching life was like for Mary when we all had to move online during COVID, and what she has kept from that time.  “Even before we went online, I was working with Sue Doner in CETL to learn how to better use D2L, for example learning how to use rubrics and grade online. Then when we moved online, I was not as stressed, and this made transition for me easier. We all, however, spent long days creating all the learning plans and the online activities. What I’ve kept from that time were some neat learning activities that we can send to students – home study packages and reflections they can complete to get ready for nursing practice. Some of them I’ve had to change, but those have been great resources.”  But Mary is still using some of the videos they created during COVID and has kept her virtual office hours.

As always, I was curious if Mary had some specific memories from her years of teaching to share. “For me, it’s those critical moments, when the teaching and the experiential learning come together at the bedside of a client. Or when a student is giving personal care for the first time on their own and I’m observing. Those moments are inspirational because you’re seeing the students make a difference. For example, I had a student a few years ago who had been working with a client and, on her own, had written up a summary of suggestions for the Clinical Nurse Leader (CNL) to share with the staff about how she had worked with this client and which things had worked well. Another time we had a client who was passing away and two students felt so compassionate they asked if they could work with just that client.  They spent the rest of the shift attending to the client and being there for the family. I didn’t organize that – the students did. You have to be open to in-the-moments experiences like these because sometimes they support the best learning.”

This piece about students being in control of their own learning is important to Mary. “It’s not about my agenda, it’s about them meeting their learning goals. We ask students to create learning plans, and some of them ask, what do you want me to write? To which I reply, what is important to you? While there are learning outcomes that must be achieved in courses, some can be more flexible and when students assign their own meaning to them, then learning happens more easily.”

I asked Mary what advice she might have for new faculty at Camosun. “Be kind to yourself – it’s a steep learning curve, becoming an instructor. Take the Instructional Skills Workshop (ISW) early on and find mentors both in nursing and in places like CETL. Try new things and be ok when they don’t land perfectly because students enjoy engaging in a variety of activities. Attend the Great Teachers conference because you will learn so much from other instructors.  Use your professional development time wisely – it goes fast and can get eaten up by curriculum development so try to read a few articles every semester for yourself, not just for your teaching. And remember: to be a good teacher, you have to be a good student and open to constructive criticism. And finally, just be open to all the exciting things that we’re privileged to have access to here at Camosun College.”

Camosun Story #77: Stephanie

Stephanie is a term instructor in the Social Sciences department where she teaches geography courses.  She has not been at the college long (since fall, 2023) and as a term instructor, does not always know if or when she will be teaching again. But she had an amazing story to tell and some great insights on teaching and learning to share.

Stephanie grew up in Arkansas where she completed a bachelor’s with a double major in geography and Arab studies.  After completing a master’s in geography, Stephanie studied tourism in Tunisia before beginning her doctoral studies in environmental studies at York University (moving to Canada for the first time). During all of this, and in between studies, she traveled, attended the American University in Morocco and the Borgiba Institute for Languages in Tunis, worked with World Heritage Sites, specifically in Carthage, then returned to the United States to study American nationalism and identity on landscapes of national parks. Finally, she moved to Qatar with her husband who works in medical imaging IT, where they spent six years before returning to Canada in 2022. “I worked at the US army base with Afghan refugees. We built a school and brought kids together. We would go out into the community and distribute donations. And I ended up teaching English – I never thought of being an English teacher, but it was what was needed.”

After renewing her permanent residency in Canada, Stephanie applied to be a substitute geography instructor at Camosun, a job she did during the winter term of 2023. Then, in the fall of 2023, she came on board as a term instructor teaching two sections of Geography 100, one blended and one in-person. And this past winter term, Stephanie was teaching a full course load, including courses on resource and environmental management, environmental sustainability, and the geography of Canada. As overwhelming as starting to teach at a new institution then taking on a full load of teaching has been for her, Stephanie tells me she has had a lot of help. Her chair at the time was with her every step of the way, and she also had help from some of my colleagues in CETL, as well as her subject liaison librarian, telling me that “every person has been amazing!”

When I asked Stephanie what drew her to teaching and what she enjoys most about it, she immediately answered, the students. “My weekends are busy with course work and sometimes I get bogged down. But when I get back with the students, it’s very energizing and I remember why I’m doing this. In spite of the ups and downs that come with teaching, I just want to engage and empower the students; I want to show them the world.”

I also wondered about her experience teaching a blended course.  “Even though I did teach and take classes online during COVID, the blended concept was completely new to me. I taught two blended sections in the winter 2024 term – one ran during the day and the other in the evening and the students in each section had very different needs. I found it challenging but Derek in CETL helped me pick out some books about online learning, and I talked to Susan Chen and Katie Waterhouse [both instructors who teach blended courses.] I would redesign the courses if given the opportunity, but you don’t always know what needs to be changed until you’re in the middle of teaching.” Right now, as a term faculty member, Stephanie unfortunately does not have the Scheduled Development time she would need to redesign the courses. But she didn’t start with nothing. “My chair was very generous in sharing her content, and I inherited some content from another faculty member, so all I had to do was fill some gaps, integrate current topics, and add a bit of myself. The blend itself was one class a week in person with the rest asynchronous in D2L, so I also had to figure out what belonged online and what needed to be in-person. Sometimes I recorded lectures, sometimes the lecture was in person and the lab activity was online – it depended on the class. I worked hard to make the courses successful, but I could only do so much with the time I had.”

I asked Stephanie if any memories of the past year of teaching had stuck with her.  “I think just making connections with students and those moments when you say something that opens their eyes to something new. For example, in the resource and environmental management course I asked students if they had heard about the ring of fire. And everyone said yes, until they realized I was talking about the ring of fire in Northern Ontario which none of them knew about, even the Canadians from Ontario. When you hook them, they get excited. For me, that’s the best part.”

Stephanie has had many international students in her courses.  “It’s amazing to have students from all over the world because they bring different perspectives.” Stephanie worked with Cristina Petersen (one of our Multilingual Support Specialists) to support her international students on how to take notes, and to provide definitions for terms they find challenging. “When I get frustrated because students aren’t coming to class or taking notes, I remind myself that every student, international or not, has their own struggles, preferences for how to learn, and reasons for being here.” Stephanie can also relate to international students because she is international herself. “In one class, we were talking about forestry in British Columbia and I asked ‘who here can vote in Canada?’ Well, of course, I can’t and that I think that helped some of the international students, knowing that I’m not from here either.”

As we came to the end of our conversation, I asked Stephanie, as a fairly new faculty member, what she would like to have had or known when she started teaching at Camosun, and what advice she would have for other new faculty.  Her answer echoed what I have heard from many other term instructors: “I would have liked to have had more time before the start of the term to figure out what I was doing, because that first term was tough. Getting a C-number, getting access to D2L and learning how to use it, etc.” In addition, Stephanie spoke to the uncertainty of not knowing if she would be teaching again in the future until the last minute, and imagining what she could do with her courses if she had more time to prepare. “As far as what would I tell new faculty: Be annoying. Ask questions. If you’re wondering about the writing center go over and knock on the door and introduce yourself. Just be annoying – it’s okay. People will be kind to you.  But you’re not going to find out unless you keep asking questions.”

Camosun Story #76 Thuy

Thuy has been a faculty member in the Biology Department at Camosun College since 1999. Thuy was finishing her master’s in molecular and developmental genetics, and had transferred into the PhD program, but after passing the PhD qualifying exam left her wandering the streets of Montreal feeling empty instead of elated, she decided teaching was really what she wanted to do.  She was accepted into the education program at McGill where she completed a two-year degree. And the rest is history.  I have spoken to Thuy a few times in the past about her teaching (sometimes on nice walks around the campus), and was really looking forward to sharing some of her insights with others.

Thuy started out teaching introductory biology courses, then began teaching anatomy and physiology (A&P) to first-year nursing students.  After 15 years of teaching A&P, an opportunity came up for her to teach the infectious disease course.  At first, Thuy was not interested, but as she thought about it (and became fascinated with sourdough cultures) she decided to give it a try, and in Fall of 2019 found herself teaching three new courses, one being the infectious disease course.  “I remember teaching my infectious disease students that first fall, talking about Ebola and other diseases where the World Health Organization will come in to mitigate spread of the disease during an outbreak. To help students understand the challenges of public health and relate to the people living through the Ebola outbreak, I said ‘can you imagine if you got sick, and people in blue vests came and said, you can’t get together with your family this Christmas because you have a respiratory illness?’ And then, COVID happened. Teaching this course turned out to be a good thing for me, because despite the horror of switching to online teaching, because I was still new to infectious disease, I found myself very curious about COVID rather than worn down by it.”

I asked Thuy what she likes best about her life as an instructor.  “I really like the creative aspect of it and the problem solving and I like learning and trying new things, whether it’s new material or new students with new problems. I find the challenges of, for example, making a particular piece of content more accessible or easier to understand, fun. And the best challenges are when students come for help, you work with them, and then see them achieve what they want – that’s really exciting. But I do find it hard when students are struggling but you have no idea if it’s a personal struggle, a content-related struggle, or a learning skills struggle – sometimes it can be difficult to support in those circumstances.”

Going back to her online teaching experience (which she found especially challenging) during COVID, I asked Thuy if there were things she continued to integrate into her teaching since coming back to in-person teaching. “I have continued to record my lectures and make them available to students, and I provide notes for them in D2L, first, to reduce stress for people who can’t make it because of illness and also to support international students, or for any student really.  For example, while my dental hygiene students come to every class, most of them watch the recordings in case they missed something. Some students don’t take notes in class anymore because they find it more effective to focus and listen and not have to worry about taking notes too.”

I wondered if Thuy had any memories of past 25 years of teaching that stuck out for her.  “There were two students – I don’t remember their names, but I still think about them sometimes. Both of them came to me for help and I spent a lot of time with them. When they came to my office, I would ask them about various topics, and they could talk to me about those topics with no problem.  However, when it came to writing the exams, they would falter. I began to feel that oral exams would have worked better for them., but at that time I didn’t know how to go about offering oral exams as an option in a way that would have seemed fair and not additionally stressful for them. Maybe if I had tried it, or if I had been able to talk to somebody who had already tried it I could have helped these students more.”

I asked Thuy what advice she might have for new instructors at Camosun.  “It doesn’t matter if you’re new or if you’ve been teaching for a while, sometimes things don’t go well, and you can lose confidence. One image which helps me when I feel really, really low, is that what I am doing is scrunching down low so that I can suddenly leap up – that periods of downs are actually periods of powering up.  Thinking about them that way can really help. In addition, so often when we as teachers get evaluations, 95% of them will be great, but those other one or two comments are the ones that hurt you, that stick with you.  But don’t hold those negative comments to your heart.”  Thuy said she thought this same idea would be helpful for students as well.  “One bad exam can be demotivating enough to make students give up. Instead, we need to all remember to use those failures as feedback. Everyone fails at one time or another and it’s not the failing that’s important, it’s what you do afterwards that matters.”

As we wrapped up our conversation, Thuy wanted to share one more story with me.  “To support students to develop their voice, I ask them to do presentations, but not in front of the entire class. Instead, they present to small groups of people at stations in the classroom. As students in the audience move from station to station, the presenting students repeat the same ten-minute presentation many times, so they become more comfortable with presenting. My dental hygiene students do this twice in one semester and once in the following semester, and by the end they have learned how to narrow down what is important, how to create visuals for the presentation, how to engage their audience and are better prepared for their capstone project, a presentation in front of 30 dentists and dental health professionals!” What a wonderful model for building an essential, transferable skill in a supportive environment.  I am looking forward to our next walk to find out what she is exploring next.

Camosun Story #75: Kristin

Kristin is an instructor in the School of Health and Human Services.  She has a background in mental health and curriculum and instruction and was hired by Camosun over 20 years ago on a contract to start a community mental health credential.  She has since worked not only to grow that program, but to develop other credentials. Today, Kristin teaches courses in the Mental Health and Addition program, as well as in the Interprofessional Mental Health and Addiction post-graduate diploma, and the Community Family and Child Studies program.

Kristin says “I came to Camosun with a non-traditional perspective of teaching. I was working with groups in psychiatry and mental health and was drawn to building relationships with students.  Our programs attract many students with their own mental health and substance use challenges, so it’s important to meet students where they’re at to recognize their strengths and support their motivation. Nothing warms my heart more than hearing grads tell us how much they changed through the program, or even partway through.”

I wondered where the students in Kristin’s program come from.  “Many times, they’re coming from support or work positions in residential settings, street programs, outreach, etc. In the classroom, students engage in reflection and self-awareness so they can become more grounded in their own values and beliefs;  if you’re going to develop relationships with the people you’re supporting, you need to understand your own perspectives to be accepting of others’ values, beliefs, and perspectives.”

I asked Kristin what impact the past three years have had on her teaching.  “Being online during COVID highlighted engagement, because if we can’t engage students in any context, online or face-to-face, then they’re not to grow and become who they need to be in order to support others. That experience pushed us as faculty to be responsive and figure out how we were going to keep students engaged and motivated when we didn’t have the containment of the classroom.” But luckily, the programs were approved to have some in-person sessions during the height of the pandemic. “It was worth the work to get classroom time on campus, and students appreciated the opportunity to work on their skill development with others.”  Kristin herself is skeptical of how relationships can be built online but appreciates that many of their grads will need to engage with clients through online platforms, making online learning relevant for them. “Some of our graduates will need to use technology to connect with and assess clients and right now we’re revamping our professional communication courses to include content on digital literacy to help students think more about the benefits of technology, and  ultimately help their clients navigate the Internet to find relevant information and reliable resources.”

One activity in one course in the program Kristin has kept from the online teaching days was one where students work in small groups and record video of themselves leading group sessions.  The video allows students to not only observe the activity and evaluate things like facial expressions, but also allows them to watch the video again and conduct a self-evaluation of the session. In addition, an assignment that required students conduct interviews at an organization on-site, but had to move online during the pandemic, has been revised to include online interviews as an option.  “This helps because professionals out in the field are very busy and the online interview option means students have more opportunities to connect with them while being more respectful of the professional’s time because they can choose what works best for them.”

Since Kristin has been teaching at Camosun for so long, I knew she must have some memories that stick in her mind. “I recall the first graduation ceremony I went to and seeing the excitement in the grads waiting to get their parchment. I was ready to shake their hands as they crossed the stage but instead, I got hugs! It was amazing to see that I meant more to them than I thought, and I felt very blessed to be a part of their learning journey.”  Another thing Kristin appreciates is the diversity of students in her classes and the relationships they build together. “We get such an eclectic group of students in our program, of all ages and with all kinds of experience and education. I still have grads from years ago contact me to let me know what they are doing now – it’s those relationships I always think about, as well as the collective wisdom that the variety of students brings to the program.”  But what Kristin really wanted me to know about her students was how much they want to be here.  “We get a lot of people that need to make career changes and have put a lot of thought into what’s going to bring them purpose in their lives. Some have retired and decided retirement is not for them, some have been in recovery and want to learn how to help others in recovery. There are so many different reasons people come to the program, but everyone’s passionate and thirsty for knowledge, and that’s what’s so exciting.”

I asked Kristin what advice she might have for new instructors in her program or at Camosun in general. “Connect with other faculty to ask about strategies and talk about challenges. Don’t take things that happen in the classroom personally because you never know why someone might be reacting the way they are. Instead, engage with that student and figure out what’s going on rather than make assumptions because that personal engagement goes a long way to help that student sort out what’s getting in the way. New instructors might not feel confident in responding to something unexpected happening in the classroom that might have them questioning their ability as an instructor.  It’s ok to say, ‘let me think about that and get back to you’ and not feel compelled to say something right then and there.”

As we wrapped up our discussion, Kristin said, “I’ve been really fortunate to be in a program with students who are passionate about learning, and I also learn from my students – I’m always changing the way I do things and am grateful that we have that freedom as instructors and as a program to be responsive to what’s going on in the community. That ability to adjust and respond to the needs of students and the people they will ultimately be serving, as well as the students themselves, makes it all worthwhile”.

Camosun Story #74: Nancy

Nancy became an instructor in the Visual Arts Department at Camosun in 1997 when she began teaching photography while completing her Master’s in art history. Currently, Nancy teaches several courses, including Modern Art History, Visual Culture, Digital Photography and Filmmaking, and Film Photography. Nancy told me that her current art practice revolves around creative writing, either on its own or in conjunction with photographs.

I sat down with Nancy to find out more about how Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has affected her teaching and her students, and she began by talking the impact GenAI has had on how she approaches her lecture-based courses. “I knew I had to start by looking at my exams. I typically provide an exam overview so that students can focus their studying and spend more time with course material. They could bring in these notes on paper or access the information from the desktop. I had open-book exams because my philosophy is that exams are opportunities for students to show off their knowledge. I use the D2L Quiz tool and allowed students to cut and paste in their answers which supports students who don’t have strong keyboarding skills and those who may struggle with English. But last summer when I was teach Modern art history, I noticed that about a third of the exam answers did not sound like students wrote them, so I felt I had to make a change. But rather than moving to pen and paper exams like some faculty have, I decided that students could bring in as much printed information as they wanted into the exam but would have to type their answers into D2L rather than copy and paste. In addition, I changed the kinds of questions I asked on the exam.”

In addition to changing her exams, GenAI also made Nancy rethink the research papers in her art history courses. Moving from her model students creating an essay proposal early in the term and handing in a final paper at the end of term, Nancy now starts with “a series of small, kickstart assignments working up to the essay proposal: a thesis statement, an outline, a bibliography of ten sources – all providing proof that students did their own work. I tell them that if I don’t think they’re doing their own work, we’re going to have a conversation.” In addition, Nancy provides a statement in her syllabi around GenAI and how it should and should not be used, not endorsing its use, but acknowledging its existence and potential as a tool.

In preparation for these changes to her assessments, Nancy decided it was important to learn how to use ChatGPT – to find out more about what it can and can’t do.  One of the first things she did was ask ChatGPT to help her revise a lecture on Russian Constructivism. “Normally writing a lecture takes 10 hours to research it, 10 hours to find the visuals and create the PowerPoint presentation, check everything for copyright, etc. So, I put everything into ChatGPT and in 10 seconds I had an outline for a lecture. I went through it, and it was pretty good – ChatGPT even included ideas I had not considered.” Nancy was elevated, but wondered, “if I’m using ChatGPT to generate lectures outlines, but telling students they can’t use it to generate ideas, am I a hypocrite? But I brought myself back to how I talk about GenAI with students, asking are you using it as a tool or a crutch?” Because in the end, as much as ChatGPT helped Nancy create her lecture outline, she still had to spend time reviewing the results before finishing it. For example, “I asked ChatGPT if other painters were painting the Death of Sardanapalus in the 1800s. It generated a list of well-known artists, the titles of the paintings, and even dates. But when I started to research these leads, all the information was fabricated.” It was an important lesson in the importance of checking ChatGPT’s work and letting students know to do the same. “I tell students if you’re going to use it, then you need to follow-up, which can be more work than just sitting in the library and typing in your keywords. And as instructors we need to understand how GenAI tools work so we can find a middle ground between ignoring it and letting its use go unchecked. Maybe someday we will see a shift in education where there is less emphasis placed on generating information and more on research and editing, where GenAI finds information and students are responsible for checking for its accuracy and then finessing the writing.”

I asked Nancy how her colleagues around the college are handling GenAI tool use in the classroom. “A tool like ChatGPT represents a big adjustment and people will embrace it slowly as they start to see what other people are doing with it. While some instructors are reverting to pen and paper assessment, a lot of people I talk to about ChatGPT are excited when I tell them how I created a rubric in 10 seconds and then spent 30 minutes to finalize it.”  What Nancy finds is that it’s in those hallway conversations where we share what we’ve tried, how we’ve failed, what we are doing to do differently, etc. that gives us courage to try something new or think about our teaching practice in a different way.

I was curious if Nancy had noticed any questions around AI in her photography classes. “I had a student last year who wondered why were not working with AI in our classes, which is a good question, but I still have to think about how it could be used creatively. If students are gathering information to create something, then AI is just another tool to support that. But using AI to create art is another thing. When I teach Photoshop [a tool which integrates AI] for example, I want students to think about why they choose AI generated effects, and not just say, ‘because it looks cool.’  Maybe another one of our roles as educators is to help students gain the language around the why.”

I’ve known Nancy for a few years now, and she is always ready to try new things to enhance her teaching, so I was happy to hear how she is embracing GenAI in these small ways. “New tools push me as an instructor, push me as an artist, push me as a human, and help me reevaluate and let go of my preconceptions. So often new things that are out of our control, like GenAI, cause people to shut down. But for me, when I start to panic, I think, okay, it’s just a tool. Let’s see what we can do with it.”

Leaving Wishful Thinking Behind: A Bookclub Reflection by Robin Fast

 

If on one side we have pessimism and anger, and on the other we have oblivious and blissful optimism, I tend to nestle comfortably and happily in the latter. I have been told, bizarrely, that this quality is a bit annoying. On closer examination, I must admit this quality may be the result of a luck-filled life – a life that, while touched, at times, by hardship, is insulated by a long list of privileges.  It may be easier to be hopeful when surrounded by good things. 

This winter, the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Book Club participants read Critical Hope: How to Grapple with Complexity, Lead with Purpose, and Cultivate Transformative Social Change by Kari Grain.  

In the book, Grain, a teacher in the Faculty of Education at the University of British Columbia, suggests that “positivity can be toxic.”  I don’t appreciate this conclusion, but, sadly, I’ve come to agree with her. How helpful can positivity be – how helpful can hope be – without a plan, without action based on a critical understanding of what’s going on? And if there isn’t space for anger and frustration, an important source of motivation for change is eliminated.

Drawing on educational thinkers like Paulo Freire, Grain describes critical hope as “a dance, a negotiation, a heated entanglement between a critical awareness of the problem (or many problems) at hand and the spark of spirit that – sometimes in contradiction to our own experiences and sensibilities –  insists on hope.” 

Many of us see students struggling to live in an increasingly complex world that, while some might argue is not necessarily any more dangerous than the world experienced by previous generations, bombards us with a hopeless, overwhelming sea of bad news – all of it easily accessible 24/7, from that shiny rectangle in our pockets. Through Critical Hope, Grain offers solutions to the overwhelm and despair some of us may be experiencing by sharing principles, strategies, classroom activities, and local and global stories of critical hope in action. 

This blogpost will offer a small taste of a few of these ideas, and, hopefully, entice you to grab the library’s copy and take a larger bite. 

The Seven Principles of Critical Hope

In Critical Hope, Grain describes what she calls a “non-exhaustive” list of principles “meant to get at the core ideas underlying critical hope” based on what she has learnt from other thinkers, leaders, and teachers. So, here we go
 

  1. Hope is necessary, but hope alone is not enough.

Hope alone is naive. Knowledge isn’t action. The commitment, discipline, self reflection, and intentional action of praxis combined with hope is critical hope. 

  1. Critical hope is not something you have. It is something you practice.

Grain offers a slightly horrifying image of a surgeon that hasn’t planned or prepared. As I read I imagine hearing, as I lie on a table and drift off, “Let’s just see how it goes, shall we?” Planning and practice is critical to critical hope. Drawing on her experience learning to play music, she describes three components of practice: 

  • Practicing your part – What is your responsibility within the broader effort in which you are engaged? 
  • Practicing your art – What is the gift you bring and how can you use it to create change? 
  • Practicing asking questions – What’s going on in the larger system? What is beyond what you can see? 
  1. Critical hope is messy, uncomfortable, and full of contradictions.

Here, Grain asks “Why do you have no mud beneath your fingernails if your goal requires you to move earth?” Some of that dirt comes through the discomfort of challenging our comfort zones: cultural values, habits, common-sense conclusions,etc.. Without this examination, she suggests, we risk perpetuating oppression in our attempts to create positive change. 

  1. Critical hope is intimately entangled with the body and the land.

Grain describes the “politics of the body,” and the contradictions in societal expectations, for example, women being policed for modesty while also being sexualized. She also describes the importance of decolonizing practices, rather than decolonization, focusing on the action as well as hope and challenging the reader to ask: How does the land affect my identity? What are the histories on this land? How can my current action impact the injustices of the past? 

  1. Critical hope requires bearing witness to social and historical trauma.

Acquiring “difficult knowledge” can make action “imperative.” It becomes an irritant like “a grain of sand in the oyster of imagination,” pushing us to ask, “Who am I now that I know this?” Grain describes this time, between acquiring knowledge and action, as a valuable liminal space, and an opportunity to reconceptualize ourselves and the world, to grapple with this new understanding and to prepare to act.   

  1. Critical hope requires interruptions and invitations.

Connecting critical hope to the role of educator and the classroom experience, Grain describes “Spider-Man moments,” those times when an opportunity exists for a big shift in perception. Perhaps a student has asked a challenging question, or perhaps they are struggling with new information and it is poking at their sense of self, their sense of self in relation to disparity or trauma. With all eyes on you, for a teacher, these moments can be “terrifying” and “whatever you do will be action.” Grain emphasizes the importance of leadership here, describing ways to prepare for and capitalize on these moments. She also suggests a context of radical hospitality — a “hospitality that welcomes all and also expects guests to respect the place and the people with whom they coexist.”

  1. Anger and grief have a seat at the table.

“Welcome each emotion as a treasured guest,” Grain advises. “Each has wisdom to offer.” The final principle focuses on the importance of accepting rage, anger, and grief, in ourselves and in others, as important components of critical hope. Rage and anger are indications of injustice. Grief is an indication of healing and can motivate us to ask questions like, what historical traumas do you need to heal from and what action do you need to take? Ignoring or discounting these emotions, Grain suggests, is an act of privilege not afforded to those most impacted by things such as systemic discrimination or global conflict. 

Bringing Critical Hope into the Classroom

Throughout the book are several helpful tools that can bring a pedagogy of critical hope into the classroom. Here are a couple of examples that I found particularly helpful. 

Grain writes that she regularly asks “students to begin the semester by writing a ‘positionality statement.’” This is a statement that describes “the position from which you view the world.” It is “an explicit recognition of your own identity and the ways your identity might affect how you listen, how you are perceived, how you move through the world, and what barriers you face or privileges you  have.” This self-reflection activity, touching on categorizations like “nationality, race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, educational level, familial roles, occupation, physical ability, mental health, and age,”  can be difficult as it turns “the lens of learning inward” while requiring students, and teachers, to explicitly acknowledge things about themselves. I’ve left links at the end of this blog to a couple examples of how to carry out this activity with students. 

A second strategy, described by Grain in support of student learning, is a framework to cultivate psychological safety in the learning environment. She offers the SAFE framework as a way “for leaders and educators to help others access neural resources related to hope.” 

The ‘S’ in SAFE stands for social engagement system: using calm and engaged responses – a voice that conveys emotion and intention, listening, smiling, and engaging eyes-to communicate safety and care.

‘A’ for attentiveness: We are “mirrors for each other” and it is important to ensure our social signaling aligns with our intent. The “most important things a leader and educator can do are to be very present in their body and to have their attention focused on the social engagement signals of the people they are interacting with.”

‘F’ for fun and playfulness: By “introducing playfulness and fun, a leader triggers a social cue that says there are no threats in this moment, there are no goals to achieve, and we are here to create an emotional experience of happiness and connection,” creating an “environment that is conducive to helping others access the higher-order features of learning, flexible problem solving, creativity, and seeing multiple possibilities.” 

And finally, ‘E’ for Expressiveness: Using “facial gestures and voice in expressive ways” so that students don’t need to make guesses about and can accurately interpret our intentions.  🙂

Fostering Critical Hope

In addition to guiding principles and specific classroom strategies, the book includes several stories about people engaged, both at the micro and macro level,  in education or social-justice work that exemplify a practice of critical hope. Each story includes bits of wisdom as well as key considerations for fostering critical hope from the person sharing their experience. I’ll share one piece, from a man named Am Johal, an activist working in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, that stood out to me as relevant to anyone working, as we are, in a large, sometimes less-than-responsive organization.  

“Institutions are clumsy, slow, and problematic. But they are also sites of possibility. And if we lose sight of that, then we lose the capacity to think about making changes at a scale that can be important.” 

Instead of pessimism or optimism, perhaps I need to engage with what is, as well as with the steps for what’s next. 

If you are considering joining the next faculty book club, please see CETL’s Calendar of Upcoming Events.

Additional resources can be found with any of us at CETL and:

Camosun College Open Education Recognition Awards

Last week was Open Education week.  While the Information Tables from the beginning of the week did not work out as anticipated, we ended the week with a bang and the Camosun College Open Education Recognition Awards.  I thought I would share with you some brief statements about the 41 recipients for you here.  A big thanks to BCcampus who provided funding for this event.

When I really think about the role of Open Education in our learning spaces, I think of Kayla Lar-Son’s (Indigenous programs and services librarian at UBC) 6Rs of Indigenous Open Education: (Indigenous programs and services librarian at UBC) respect, relationships, responsibility, reverence, relevance, and reciprocity. These concepts are not only vital to honouring Indigenous knowledge and sovereignty in our work as educators, but also key to the work we do in Open Education in general.

  • When working in Open Education we must have respect for the work we do in this space, the students we are doing it for, and for the people who engage in the work.
  • We have a responsibility to provide our students with affordable education and to our colleagues to support them to meet that goal.
  • Building and nurturing relationships are key to collaborating and working together.
  • Reciprocity is central to the ideals behind Open Education through sharing the open work we create.
  • Because Open Educational Resources are flexible and can be adapted, we can provide more relevant resources and curriculum for our students.
  • And we need to remember how important it is that we show reverence for the people who engage in this work – and this is what we are gathered here today to do, celebrating for the second year in a row the open education work of our faculty at the college.

This year’s recipients embody these 6Rs, as faculty members who have made profound contributions to open education at Camosun College and demonstrated an impact on student learning and student costs by utilizing, designing, or adapting open resources in their instruction.

Puja Gupta, School of Access: Puja has, until recently when she moved into the Acting Associate Dean role in the School of Access, taught Math in both the Community Learning Partnership and the Academic Career Foundations programs.  She is passionate about providing her students with access to free resources, especially since her programs are tuition free, and has adapted a combination of existing Open Textbooks for her courses.  I was got to know Puja through the Open Ed Sustainability project where she worked to create an extensive math test bank in the MyOpenMath platform.  Puja is also very generous with her time and her open resources, sharing them with colleagues across the college.

Education and Career Planning Certificate Program (Diane Gilliland, Val Neaves, Allyson Butt), School of Access: The Education and Career Planning Certificate Program (EDCP) is a 7-week tuition-free program which provides its learners with free online readings.  Diane Gilliland and Val Neaves are both instructors in the program, and Allyson Butt is the instructional assistant.  In 2020, they worked together to move EDCP to fully online blended synchronous/asynchronous by adapting the BC open course-pack EDCP: Career Planning.  I interviewed Diane, Val, and Allyson about their work in the EDCP program (previously BEST) and these three do amazing work together and with their learners.  I also have to mention that the EDCP program is proof that community can be created online, which Diane points out is rooted in Martin Brokenleg’s work and in the work this group did to indigenize their curriculum in order to acknowledge and strengthen belonging, mastery, independence and generosity.  Diane, Val, and Allyson also wanted me to recognize the assistance from Monique Brewer, Deidre Murphy, and the CETL group who helped and continue to help them to create clear, organized, accessible curriculum.

Katie Waterhouse, Anthropology, Arts & Sciences: Katie has been a user of Open Textbooks for a while now, using an open text produced by the American Anthropological Society for her Anth 260 course since 2020 and also in 2020 moved away from a textbook and is using library resources for her Anth 250 course (creating a Zero Textbook Cost model.)  More recently Katie has been creating H5P interactive objects (an open learning object creation tool) to support her students’ learning in all of her courses.  She has co-facilitated the H5P workshop and shared examples with me and other faculty members.  Katie continues to explore OER for her other courses.

Leanne Pyle, Geoscience, Arts & Sciences: Leanne teaches Geoscience courses, including Physical Geology (Geos100) and Earth-Ocean-Atmosphere System (Geos110).  She has been using Open textbooks to support her students in Geos 100 since she started at the college in 2019, using the TRU Online Physical Geology open text, and switched over her 110 course to all open texts, combining pieces from several open textbook, in 2020.  Like so many faculty we are celebrating here, Leanne’s work has largely gone unnoticed, until today.

Susan Chen, Math and Statistics, Arts & Sciences: Susan is passionate about providing high quality Open Educational Resources for her students and 10 years ago discovered and began using an Open textbook (Open Intro Statistics) and online homework system (My Open Math) for her STAT 116 course. Her goal for the near future is to, after many years of searching, find an open textbook for another statistics course or to create a zero-cost course pack for the students. Susan’s Chair Patrick Montgomery also had this to say “The work to support an evolving discipline such as statistics is ongoing, as new examples appear regularly and can only be included in the classroom by either buying new and expensive textbooks or by spending the time and effort to incorporate the information into in-house course packs. Susan is a department leader in building online resources for her classes and has made Statistics even more affordable.”

Patricia Wrean, Math and Statistics, Arts & Sciences: Pat has been a determined and steadfast supporter of her students, and has actively looked for ways to make her classes more accessible and at minimal cost to the student.  According to her Chair Patrick Montgomery, the WeBWorK system she uses provides free access to students to learn through online homework problems, but it needs a knowledgeable support person to make this work.  Pat has been that person and her knowledge and expertise is appreciated by her students and colleagues.

Stephanie Ingraham, Physics, Arts & Sciences: Stephanie teaches in the Physics department, where she is also the Chair.  I had the pleasure of working with Stephanie for the Open Education Sustainability project where she worked on creating an Open Textbook for Physics of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. While the MRT course she created this for has been altered, the true joy of creating open textbooks is being able to adapt them to different courses, so Stephanie is hoping to take some of what she created and use it in future teaching. She is also a big supporter of her faculty in using OER for their own courses.

Randal Tonks, Psychology, Arts & Sciences: Randal has been using the Introduction to Psychology open textbook by Stangor and Walinga for 10 years to support his section of Psychology 130, impacting approximately 80 students per term.  He also offers it as an optional textbook when teaching Psyc 100A and 100B at UVic.  In addition, Randal has helped to create an instructor’s test bank to support this text – work that is very important since one of the stumbling blocks faculty face with adopting open textbooks is the lack of testing materials and other ancillary resources.

Michelle Clement, Marketing, School of Business: Michelle has taught Marketing in the School of Business since 2004.  I got to know Michelle during the Open Education Sustainability project when I supported her with adapting an open textbook, The Power of Selling, in Pressbooks.  The textbook was over 600 pages long and 10 years out of date, so Michelle had her work cut out for her, but she reduced the text to just over 200 pages, added images to make it a bit more engaging, and brought the content into our current world.  The year after she adapted the text, Michelle added supplementary material for faculty including PowerPoint slides and in class activities for each chapter to encourage them to adopt the book.  Michelle has adopted and adapted many open textbooks over the years, and continues to do so, but she also integrates library resources and her own materials into the mix, and generously shares her course materials with her colleagues.

Adventure Education, Centre for Sport and Exercise Education (John Telford and Michael Pardy) and Sport Management, Centre for Sport and Exercise Education (Charles Parkinson, Brianna Waldman, Chris Psutka, Anthony Pluta, Robert Bettauer, Michael Suraci, Graham Thomson, Simon Cass)

I am really pleased to be recognizing these two programs in the Centre for Sport and Exercise Education.  When I was frantically emailing chairs to find out who at the college is teaching ZTC courses for the strategic plan metrics, Charles Parkinson emailed to say that two of his programs were ZTC: Sport Management (20 courses) and Adventure Education (10 courses), whose instructors use a combination of academic articles, research studies, guest experts, applied learning, and other vehicles to support their courses.  We have talked a lot today about creating OER and Open Textbooks, but courses can also be Zero Textbook Cost by using library resources, online resources, course packs in D2L, in addition to Open Textbooks, especially if there is no one textbook that meets your course needs.  And this is another great example of this work happening without anyone at the college really knowing about it.  Thanks for all of your work!

Liz Morch, Dental Hygiene, School of Health and Human Services: Liz has taught in the Dental Hygiene program at Camosun since 1990!  I got to know Liz during the Open Education Sustainability project when I supported her with creating a WordPress site to house five modules covering basic topics in nutrition.  This open site was created not only to support her DHYG328 Nutrition course (giving students the option to learn the content at their own pace), but also for anyone who might need access to academically sound resources related to nutrition, knowing that this is a subject covered in many programs at Camosun and beyond. Liz is an education innovator and mentor to Camosun faculty who are interested in exploring creative approaches to teaching, and a huge champion of Open Education, supporting her students in whatever way she can – and providing free course materials is definitely one way in this world of escalating costs to support our students.

Brian Coey, Sheet Metal, Trades and Technology: Brian formerly taught Sheet Metal and is now the Chair of Trades Development at Camosun.  I got to know him during his work with the Open Education Sustainability project, but that was not Brian’s first BCcampus funded foray into Open Education.  In addition to the work he did on Camosun’s project, he also worked on Sheet Metal program materials with Okanagan College.  Like many of the trades, updated resources and textbooks were just not available for Sheet Metal, and Brian wanted to create materials to support the four Levels of Sheet Metal apprenticeship training.  He has since completed Pattern Development for all 4 levels including videos and animations and is acknowledged as an author and reviewer of the open Trades Access Common Core series, which contains 23 books that are used across the province for entry-level trades training in various apprenticeship programs. Brian was a recipient of a BCcampus Award for Excellence in Open Education award in 2021.

Kyle Broad, Sheet Metal, Trades and Technology: I was so pleased when Kyle was nominated for an open education recognition award.  Kyle is the Chair of Motor Vehicle and Metal Trades and as a chair, he is the Workplace leader for faculty in a large number of disciplines.  Ken Kosik, the Associate Dean of Trades and Technology, said “While Kyle has not himself been directly involved in the development of OER, he is very supportive of faculty in his area, who are engaged in OE resource development, particularly for Brian Coey, for example adjusting schedules and bring in temporary faculty to allow Brian to pursue OE opportunities.”  Kyle is unable to be here today, but I am happy he approved his nomination for this award, because having leadership in our college supporting faculty is what makes Open Education work possible.

Plumbing and Pipe Trades Department, Trades and Technology

I was so happy this group was nominated.  I have been very aware of their work for a long time, especially through working with Rod Lidstone when I first started at Camosun. Rod and Plumbing and Pipe Trades, are responsible for a number of early-created Open Textbooks in the BCcampus Trades collection.  I want to quote from the Dean of Trades and Technology, Eric Sehn, and the department Chair, Darren Vaux.  Eric says “The entire Plumbing/Pipe department Faculty have been trailblazers in Open Education for years. Rod Lidstone (now retired) was our resident expert and completed a number of contracts for BC Campus. The current Chair is Darren Vaux, who also has developed distributed delivery materials in the past with CETL.”  And from Darren “As you are aware, Rod is the reason that we have had so much success with Open Ed Resources, both in their creation and adoption, for our trades. Rod is the one who had the foresight to pioneer and navigate all the awesome things that we get to do here at Pipe Trades. I am fortunate to have taken over an amazing program that we are all very proud of. Thank you again for the recognition.”

The Plumbing and Pipe Trade Department is Al Paterson, Alasdair Reid, Andrea Durdle, Andy Wilson, Darren Hall, Darren Vaux (Chair), Dennis Morris, Derek Meadows, Josh Stull, Landon Martin, Robert Medwid, Rodney Lidstone, Ron Perkin, Steve Nixon, Steve Bitschy, Flynn Boles, James Smyth

And finally, we recognized Gwenda Bryan, a librarian here at Camosun.  Open Education has much of its roots in librarians and their support for open access resources, and the librarians here are no exception – every program at Camosun has a liaison librarian and they work with faculty to find ZTC and open options to support their courses.  We wanted to recognize Gwenda this year for her work on the new Open Education LibGuide and many other advocacy pieces with me, faculty, and students in spite of being extraordinarily busy.

Camosun Story #73: Helen

Helen is a Co-op and Internship Coordinator (CIC) with the Technology programs at Camosun, as well as Chair for Cooperative Education.  Helen has been working in post secondary education for most of her career and explained, “I have always been interested in the teaching and learning process, even when I was in administrative or coordination roles. And I am particularly interested in experiential education and reflective learning, or work-integrated learning which is how co-op fits in.”

Part of Helen’s work as a CIC is to teach a Career Development Workplace Preparation Skills course, known as CDEV.  “CDEV is a competency-based course teaching students about career development that includes assessing one’s own interests, skills and abilities; understanding the world of work; and connecting with professionals, and opportunities, in industry.” Helen also noted that for her program area, CDEV is a requirement for graduation, meaning that not all students are keen to take it.

Because CDEV is required, Helen sometimes finds teaching it challenging. “Ideologically, I want people to learn, not just finish with a grade.  But it’s challenging to engage students meaningfully when they are motivated by the technology aspects of their program and are very busy in their courses.

Most of the assignments in CDEV are not graded – with the exception of the cover letter and resumĂ©, with a requirement of achieving 70% or higher to complete the course.   A strong cover letter and resume is the biggest artifact coming out of CDEV for students.  After Helen heard about ungrading, she had a conversation with Robin Fast and thought it “might be a solution to some of the tensions I was experiencing” around student engagement and grading that assignment within a pass/fail course.  “I love to try out new things, so last fall I decided to scrap the itemized rubric for the cover letter and resumĂ© and made it more qualitative. I still had grades, but used a binary method where One was ‘you’ve met the requirements’ and Zero was ‘you need to keep working on it.’”

Helen anticipated my next question; how did it go? “It’s a work in progress and I need to refine things for next time. What I found is that ungrading didn’t seem to give students enough direction. Part of me thinks I may have removed some incentives by removing the quantitative rubric. When it was clear that the requirement to pass was 70 out of 100, they had incentive to work harder, even though I would tell them not to do it for the grade.”

A piece of ungrading that supported the workplace preparation and student engagement aspects of CDEV was the feedback component, which in ungrading is typically formative and collaborative.  “Students need to learn how receive feedback and to be able to adapt based on feedback.   While I had always incorporated peer feedback into class activities, I required students to submit their feedback along with their application documents so I could help them be accountable to the feedback they received. And thanks to Robin, I implemented audio feedback for students, which was a way for me to provide personal commentary about their submissions.”  One problem she encountered was that while “students were allowed to resubmit their documents as many times as they needed to, many of them seemed to disregard the feedback that was given. It almost seemed that without a grade, feedback did not matter.”

One aspect of ungrading Helen particularly appreciates is the focus it brings to building relationships in the classroom. “I feel that this experience with ungrading enhanced my relationships with students and contributed to a wonderful communal learning experience. In fact, I heard more than once that the peer reviews and the discussions in class and enabled students to better connect with each other if I can get them to talk to the student next to them, that’s a win!”

Helen reminded me that “these students are in a grueling and competitive program, and I like to think that CDEV supports them to excel at a personal level, because CDEV is all about them. I believe if I can boost their confidence through CDEV, that will also be good for their career. And because their success is based on the choices they make, I’d like them to choose to be successful, not be reliant on a grade as a measure of success. That’s why ungrading appeals to me as a principle.”

What is the future of ungrading for Helen?  “I’m going to keep it with some refinements. I think when you do something new you should give it more than just one try. Not everyone is comfortable with trying new things and possibly failing, but if something you try works out, then others may be willing to try it out too. In the end, our goals are to help our students succeed in their careers and prepare them for the real world.” And Helen believes many of ungrading aspects, like reflection and collaborative feedback, can support those goals.

Camosun Story #72: Robin and Ungrading

You may remember Robin from such stories as Camosun Story #7 (SO long ago) and Becoming Unravelled: a reflection.  Robin is both a faculty member in the Community, Family & Child Studies (CFCS) program as well as an Educational Developer in the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning.  A few weeks ago, I sat down with Robin to talk about his journey into ungrading, foreshadowed by his Unravelled post.

“This journey for me began when I started with CETL last year. I facilitated the book club with a book about ungrading already assigned, and then wrote my reflection blog post. But for awhile now I’ve been grappling with how to make sure everything I do aligns with my principles of teaching and learning, and wondering how we can grade students for their efforts when grading is not at all an objective measurement of their learning.”

Robin’s work with the book club clarified that he was not alone in struggling with having to assign grades. “Students are supposed to make mistakes, try things out, and practice” and grading them at every step along the way may not encourage them to continue in that ongoing learning whether that grade is “good” or not.  And when Robin read the ungrading book he realized that he had already been doing quite a bit of ungrading. “For example, in the CFCS diploma, we have practicum courses that aren’t graded – those courses are assessed as complete or not complete and the assignments all align with that. Students are expected to meet learning outcomes to a level where they’re ready to practice independently in the community.  So, if an assignment doesn’t reflect that ability, we ask them to redo it and explain how they can improve.” But what Robin realized was that the other courses students take were not preparing them for that practicum learning experience, although within those graded courses, Robin was providing assignments that were NOT graded.  “For example, if students are doing presentations, they will for the most part receive an A because they are taking a risk by standing up and speaking and you don’t want to discourage them.”  But the conversations Robin had in book club helped him realize that ungrading was important for every assignment. As a result, Robin decided to move a class he had taught many times completely into the world of ungrading for the following Fall term.

“The course I ungraded is CFCS 110, Foundations for Practice, and is a first semester course in a two-year diploma program. Melissa (another ungrader) shared some examples of wording she used to describe ungrading to students, and I made some modifications to my course using those examples. I got rid of any of the one and done assignments and made sure all assignments were formative.” Robin noted that ungrading research discusses how ungrading is both positive for students and disruptive, because it is a radical change from how they are used to being assessed. Communicating clearly and regularly with students is, therefore, essential to build their comfort with ungrading.  “At the very beginning of the course, I described the ungrading process to students and gave them a document describing the reasons for ungrading, what some of the problems are with grading, and why this could be valuable to their learning. I explained that I would give them regular feedback on their assignments, but they wouldn’t receive a letter grade for their assignments. I also clarified how redoing assignments would work to meet the course expectations.”

Robin chose to provide audio feedback to students so that they could hear his voice explaining clearly what he saw that they were doing well in the assignment, and places that they could improve for the next assignment or for a resubmission if that was needed. “Audio feedback is easy to create, can be more detailed, and supports building a relationship with the learner much better than written feedback.”

Robin also met with students individually right before the midpoint of the course, taking class time to do so. “That took a couple weeks to complete.  I intended to meet again with each of them towards the end of the semester, but I did not manage that this time around.” While time consuming, Robin feels this piece of the switch to ungrading is critical, to build trust in the feedback process, and making sure he was always following through with his commitments to them.

Because self-reflection is an important component in ungrading, Robin had his students reflect on their progress at both the midpoint and the end of the course. “When you ask students to assign a letter grade for themselves, you reserve the right to adjust it, which opens the door to a conversation if there’s disagreement.”  Robin asks things like: How do you see yourself progressing over the semester? Have you responded to feedback from one assignment for the next? “In my past courses students have often been dragged down by a weak assignment at the beginning of the semester meaning their final grade may not reflect where they’ve come to by the end of the semester. None of that is a factor with the ungrading process because their letter grade is based on how they see themselves progressing and what they’ve learned by the end of the course.”

Whether you use ungrading or not, students need to receive a letter grade, and Robin wondered how students would assess themselves – would they all give themselves an A+?  “I came to two conclusions. First was that letter grades, no matter how hard we try, are subjective measures of something, and not necessarily learning, so why am I worried about what grade students are assigning? Second was that research says students are typically harder on themselves with their grades that we are, and I found that was true in many cases, where students assigned themselves a letter grade which was lower than I would have.”

Robin also puzzled over the disconnect between ungrading and having to assign a grade.  “If I tell students that the letter grade system is subjective for instructors to assign, how can I expect them to assign themselves a grade? So, I discussed that apparent contradiction with students and provided them with a clear rubric. And I know some ungrading instructors will build that rubric with students, so they have even more of an understanding of what it is that they’re working towards.” Another challenge Robin has with letter grades is how they turn education into something that is ranked.  “In real life, after they complete college, students will go to work, get feedback on the work they do, and use that feedback to improve – that’s the way our whole world works.  So why don’t we make sure that we’re aligning that with how we’re teaching here?”

Robin was happy with how his first foray into ungrading went. “I received positive feedback from students both during the course and at the end. In fact, I had one student tell me that she felt like she had never learned in school before, but now she felt like she was learning.  She could focus on the content and not worry about meeting the instructor’s expectations in order to get the right grade.”

Even beyond improving student learning, Robin found that “the process of reviewing student assignments and giving them feedback was so much more enjoyable and productive than it has been for me in the past. Being able to simply focus in on the feedback, and not have to worry about how my feedback connected with a letter grade, wasn’t only freeing, but it was much better aligned with how I see effective education.” And students were excited to receive his feedback.  “Students told me that in the past they have been anxious and worried about looking at their feedback, but now they were looking forward to it so that they could improve their next assignment.”

I asked Robin if he had spoken to any of his colleagues about ungrading. “Colleagues agree with me about the incongruity between letter grades and the work we’re trying to do as instructors. But they wonder: Will students be motivated? Will they be confused by the lack of grading? But the nice thing about ungrading is that there are many ways to implement it.” Although Robin cautions, implementing ungrading is more work for the students. “Students may be redoing an assignment instead of just moving on to the next one and reflecting on their experience and learning process. But I’ve never had such consistent attendance as I had this last semester, probably because the assignments were designed such that students needed to be in the classroom, engaging with the material and each other, in order to successfully complete them.”

I wondered what advice Robin might have for faculty wanting to try out some ungrading. “I’m really privileged because in my program, there are no multiple sections of classes and faculty are all working with the same cohort of students, so we don’t have the pressure for every course section to be similar. But I think there are some guiding principles that are helpful. First, be transparent. Talk with your students about what you’re doing and why, laying it out clearly for them and following through with your commitments to them.” Second, start small.  “Try revising one or two assignments to be ungraded rather than your entire course.”  And third, consider the time commitment. Set expectations on how often you meet with students and discuss feedback with them, as well as due dates for resubmitted assignment to help you manage your time.

What is the future of ungrading for Robin? “I have a hard time imagining myself not using it in the future. Next time I teach a letter grade course my plan is to ungrade it. If I can do it in a first semester course, I can do it anywhere else in the program. And I will continue to talk with my colleagues about if and where they might want to try ungrading out.”  But will he change anything?  “Yes. There were quite a few students at the end of the semester who still had to resubmit assignments, so I need to be clearer about the resubmission process to help students stay on track a bit better. And I want to find space for more individual meetings with students.”

In the end, Robin says he was surprised, but gratified, to see the shift in how students responded to assignment feedback.  “I didn’t change the way I was giving feedback – audio feedback, focusing on positives – I just removed the grade and thus the pressure on students. The only difference was removing that letter grade.”

Camosun Story #71: Sonja

Sonja is a faculty member in the School of Business where she teaches Introduction to Human Resources (HR), Employment Law, Labour Relations, and HR Trends.  Like many Camosun faculty, Sonja came to teaching after first working in her field.  She began studying HR at the British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT) in her twenties when she finally felt ready to begin post-secondary studies, saying “BCIT was very different from a traditional university and opened my mind to higher education.” Sonja worked in HR departments in both the private and public sectors and eventually began to focus on labour relations.  “My main focus was on building relationships between people and through my work began to realize that the how was what mattered: how we handle people and issues within organizations is more important than the what we have to do, and how we do it brings the focus back on the people in our organizations.”

In 2013 Sonja came to Camosun College into the sole labour relations position at the college. “My focus remained the same – on building relationships so the unions and management could effectively discuss and resolve issues long-term,” something she feels she succeeded at. Sonja has always enjoyed training people not familiar with human resources or labour relations and “became more interested in teaching others the how: how to approach people; how to deal with difficult issues; how to find creative solutions without getting personal. And over the years I realized, hey, I like this education thing.”

AS Sonja worked to complete the Provincial Instructor Diploma Program (PIDP) and the then Dean of the School of Business asked her to teach a class. She said yes and was terrified, but said “after teaching my first class, I knew I was where I was supposed to be and that I would be saying goodbye to the full-time HR side of my life and starting on a new career path. And I haven’t regretted that decision for a single day.”

I asked Sonja to tell me more about why she loves teaching.  “I was always exhausted after training, but teaching does the opposite – it fills my bucket instead of emptying it.”  She even loves some of the aspects of marking “because you get to see where students are at. I’m both terrified and excited when I’m marking, and always wonder if I am getting the message across.”  But most of all Sonja enjoys how every semester is different. “Every semester is a project, because there are different students, meaning you’re building new relationships and connections, and the constant change in diversity within the classroom is a bonus for me. I like having to adjust how I’m explaining something and trying to make my courses more accessible.”

Sonja’s is passionate about making things more accessible for students. “My joy lies in making materials that are more easily accessed and used by multiple learners. Making sure we’re presenting materials in multiple ways, takes a lot of planning, but students really appreciate it.” But, as Sonja notes, it takes a village to provide those options for students. “In one semester I might have ten registered Centre for Accessible Learning (CAL) students in a class, but I might also have an additional five who have not registered with CAL but might need those supports – and every semester is different. So, building those relationships with the fabulous people in the Centre for Accessible Learning, the Office of Student Support, Counselling, and CETL is key.  If I didn’t have all those pieces working all together, I wouldn’t be successful.”

As we talked, Sonja mentioned the pivot to online in 2020, and I asked her what impact the past few years have had on her teaching. “Having to fly by the seat of your pants made me more willing to try things and make mistakes and forced me to learn how to break the system and then repair it! We also were reminded that instructors are content experts in just one area that students are not, and students can help with technological issues because they’re so tech savvy! But it’s important to remember that we are all learning together.”

Sonja also carried forward many of the lessons she learned during that time, for example all the planning that needs to go into online teaching. “I just developed an asynchronous employment law class, which is going well because of the amount of work that went into the planning. I met with an instructional designer in CETL, and we walked through the process of organizing the course and decided on templates and videos. Every week is chunked with video playlists that are transcribed so all learners can access them, and there are case studies so students can focus on real life situations where they have to apply the theory that they’ve learned in previous courses. I incorporated everything that I learned during COVID. But it takes time, and I never feel I have enough.” She recommends that faculty use their Scheduled Development for planning and building online and blended courses, so you aren’t working on a course build off the side of your desk at the same time you are teaching.

Now that Sonja has been teaching for a few years, I wondered if she had any memories that stood out for her. “I love the student engagement around real-life problems, for example running our collective bargaining simulation in class or running a panel interview. Students get into their roles and ask great questions. It’s the practice before they go out into the world, which is what educational experiences should be.  For the panel interview, they develop behavioral-based interview questions and perform that interview on video. For the bargaining simulation, they write their bargaining proposals (usually 3-4), which are graded, then exchange proposals and try to form a collective agreement. This process helps them understand how complicated it must be to bargain 100 proposals in several months.”  Sonja also appreciates the diversity of students she has in the classroom. “Students learn from International students where perhaps unions are illegal in their country – hearing perspectives like those mean our domestic learners are getting a much richer experience.”

One course Sonja is teaching is HR Trends.  “There’s no textbook for that class and we build the content together as a class. Students work towards presenting a symposium at the very end of the class and each student group presents for 45 minutes on an HR trend that they’ve been researching for the entire semester. The students are very creative with the assignments, which I love to see, but the course also piques their interest in different areas of HR meaning they get exposure to more than I might cover on my own.”

As always, my final question to Sonja was about what kind of advice she has for faculty just starting out at Camosun.  “Use the supports that are out there! Ask your Chair right away who to contact in CETL, and who the contacts are for student support, counseling, etc.  Remember you really can’t do your best work in a vacuum – build those relationships. And most of all, be kind to the people who support you, and be kind to yourself.”