Katie, a recipient of an Open Education/ZTC Recognition award, a Teacher Recognition award, and the Arts and Science Award for Teaching (2023,) has been teaching Anthropology at Camosun for almost 10 years, She is also chair of the Social Sciences Department which consists of the following programs: Anthropology, Geography, Gender Sexuality and Women’s Studies, Political Science, Sociology, and Social Work. When she told me she is a forensic anthropologist by training, I was intrigued. “I think forensic anthropology is about discovering people’s stories and returning them home to their loved ones. Specifically, my PhD research examined the effects of fire on bones and explored how we can tell a person’s story from burned skeletal material.” Katie said that she (like many of us) had read forensic anthropology mystery books like those of Kathy Reichs prior to entering the field, but she says her focus today is different from where she started. “I used to think it was cool to look at a bone and figure out what happened to the person. But now I think about who that person was – about their social identity, their humanity, their personhood. I recently developed a class called The Science of Identity where we talk about biological identity (our DNA, our fingerprints, our skeleton) and our social identity. When we’re trying to do an identification, we’re collecting a lot of data on the biological identity, but the point is to find out who that person is as a human, and who they’re connected to. Biological data can tell us what a person ate when they were four, but it doesn’t tell us who that person is.”
Katie, like many faculty members I have talked to, stumbled into teaching. “During my PhD studies, I thought I should teach a bit. But when I started teaching, I hated it. While teaching was terrifying, I knew that if I kept teaching, I would get better at it and would enjoy it.” Over time and with practice, Katie gained confidence in her teaching and is currently working on the Provincial Instructor Diploma Program (PIDP). “In the PIPD, I am collaborating with colleagues who don’t have as much teaching experience as I do and I wonder, when did that happen?”
I wondered what Katie likes most about teaching. “Every semester I meet a new group of students with a new set of needs, a new set of challenges, and a new way of doing things, and I feel like I know nothing again. But from my ten years of experience, I know that you’re always going to feel like you don’t know what you’re doing.” But the students are only part of the fun. “I have the joyful, amazing privilege of working with two of the best people in the college in terms of their personhood, their culture, their community, their support: Nicole and Tara in Anthropology. They are the best primates (or, as we three together are sometimes known, trimates) for creating a team where we can lean on each other strengths, push each other, and share ideas and resources with each other.”
Katie and her Anthropology colleagues support each other to teach both in-person and online courses. With regards to teaching asynchronous, Katie feels she has grown a lot as an online instructor but is always trying to improve that skill set. “Right now, I’m rewriting most of my online class because while it worked last year, this year it’s not working as well with a different group of students who have different expectations.” And she will share what she learns with her colleagues, just as they share with her what they are doing in their classes. “Nicole does more applied stuff in her class, so I can piggyback on her ideas when I need to do applied stuff, and when she takes on the online class for me while I’m chair, she will take what I’ve been doing and build that into her own material. Nicole can turn something into an applied in class activity by blinking at it, while Tara can explain those complex cultural connections and nuances in ways I hadn’t thought of. But once I learn how she does it, then I can too.”
Speaking of being the chair, I wondered how Katie envisioned that role for herself and her colleagues. “For me, it’s about trying to create a community – a space of openness and sharing – which cannot be done by one person but needs to be set up and established as a culture of connection and engagement. I can try to model that behavior as an individual, but unless it’s mirrored by others in the group, it’s not going anywhere. It’s difficult because each program in the Social Sciences department has its own culture, expectations, personalities, routines, and ways of doing things, and it’s very difficult to break out of those. I can only lead and be a chair in the way that I naturally am.” But part of the job of a chair leading such a diverse group is to “learn how each of their disciplines work, as well as how they make decisions, coordinate, and work, and ask what they need from me to support them. And finally, to create space for them to come together, especially for my colleagues who are a discipline of one.”
Turning back to her teaching, I recalled that during a recent Teaching and Learning Community of Practice session, Katie brought up the challenges of creating a culture of academic integrity particularly in online classrooms, and I was curious about her thoughts on this. “In my PIDP courses I explored this idea, but I don’t know what that answer is. One suggestion I came across was to address an incident of academic integrity with the whole class, not just with an individual, especially in an asynchronous online space, so you can address it as a group. But the biggest challenge with online is building relationships and community where you can have conversations like this.” Katie understands this challenge, not just as an online instructor, but also as an online student in the PIDP program. “The PIDP class I’m taking right now is about cooperation and collaboration in a college classroom and about building relationships: student to student, peer to peer relationships, student to instructor which I think is the biggest challenge with online. Many of the conversations we have in this class revolve around building long-term relationships and investments in working together. But what if building those relationships and collaborations becomes a hoop people have to jump through? For example, my current PIDP class partner works, has kids, and is taking this class because it’s the last one they need to take before their capstone. Life is busy, and even when one is committed to their learning, it’s still difficult to do collaborative work.”
Considering options of bringing the best of online and in-person together, I asked Katie if her department, Social Sciences, was exploring offering blended courses. “We are increasing the number of blended offerings in social science. At first, it was only geography courses, but then I ran a blended course myself last year and we have more instructors interesting in trying blended. We do have to figure out how to communicate to students, though, to ensure they know they’re signing up for a blended course. I’m excited for blended because it provides a good mix of giving students less scheduled time in class, while focusing on relationship building and the working with each other during that class time. In my blended class, the students talked to each other way more than I’ve ever seen before, starting the labs talking about the readings and asking each other questions, and engaging in peer-to peer-teaching in the online space – but they needed the physical scheduled in-person space to make that happen.”
We then moved the conversation to some of the ways Katie has been supporting students, namely the use of H5P and running Zero Textbook Cost courses. “I just created my 100th H5P object to support student engagement in my asynchronous classes. I know from a pedagogical perspective, it’s good to include something active for students to do, even if not everyone completes them. H5P activities also provide different ways to access and apply information. In my in-person classes we do a lot of think-pair-share and other activities, and H5P turns those activities into interactives for students in the online space.” In addition to creating H5P objects, Katie has worked to move her courses to Zero Textbook Cost (as have her Anthropology colleagues.) “There are a number of different reasons we’ve done this work. One is that, especially in biological anthropology, the content changes all the time as new discoveries are made, so textbooks become out of date very quickly. Also, I have a lot of students in my 200-level class who are not going to carry on in biological anthropology – it’s an elective that looks interesting to them. And I don’t want to burden them with additional cost for a textbook that won’t be a part of their continued education.” Luckily for Katie there was an open textbook that worked for her course. “The nice thing about an open textbook is that I can pick and choose the parts I want to cover and the students can pick and choose how they interact with it, because you can listen to it, you can move it on the screen, or you can download the PDF.” And in the Anth 104 course, they have gotten rid of the textbook entirely “partly because we weren’t consistently requiring students to read it and partly because it’s hard to learn from a textbook because it can be dull and bland and does not represent the voices of the instructors of the course. So, instead, Tara and Nicole have started building content in D2L web pages, adapting material from the online course, and adding a glossary and key terms.”
I wondered if Katie had any memories from her years of teaching to share. “Honestly, the richest learning for me is where I am learning with them, we’re collaborating, and we’re figuring something out together. One example is in the labs where you’re problem-solving alongside students, figuring out the answers based on the facts we know.” Another memory Katie had involved community engagement with middle school students. “A few years ago, my evolution of diversity students built evolution activities for students from Lansdowne Middle School who came up to the college to engage in the activities and ask our students questions. It was so awesome to see the Camosun students’ confidence grow in the role of experts.” And the most recent example Katie discussed was working on the Camosun Bear with Nicole where “Nicole and I shared our experience, asking questions of each other, learning alongside the students.”
Once Katie had mentioned The Camosun Bear, I had to hear more. “It’s really Nicole’s bear and Nicole’s story, and I had the wonderful opportunity to jump in. Nicole was gifted a bear carcass, by an Indigenous colleague in 2021. Nicole worked with Facilities to dig a hole on campus and bury the remains. Then we forgot about it until one year, students did an archaeological survey to try to find where it had been buried. Then last year, using archaeological principles, Nicole’s archaeology students went through the process of excavating the bear skeleton. During the excavation, the Camosun preschoolers came to visit the bear as did Indigenous Studies (IST) cohort students. Sandee Mitchell sang the bear awakening song and the IST students taught us many of the protocols for how we should care for the bear during the excavation process. And then my forensic students cleaned and labeled the skeleton. And now the Camosun bear is part of our teaching collection.” And in addition, Nicole made a video of this whole community-engaged learning experience which is available at Unearthing the Camosun College bear, along with a more extensive story about the project.
My final question for Katie, after so many fascinating and exciting insights into her time as a faculty member at Camosun, was around advice she has for new colleagues. “You’ve got to teach your way. Your colleagues may inspire you, but nothing is more effective than you teaching with your authentic voice. You can steal ideas – I’m great at stealing ideas from other people – but trust your gut. The best teaching in your classroom will always be your own.”